Comments on: Widgetize your Nabaztag! http://dev.netvibes.com/blog/2007/11/08/widgetize-your-nabaztag/ News and articles about the Netvibes API Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:08:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Xavier http://dev.netvibes.com/blog/2007/11/08/widgetize-your-nabaztag/#comment-1938 Xavier Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:13:54 +0000 http://dev.netvibes.com/blog/2007/11/08/widgetize-your-nabaztag/#comment-1938 Nope. That would be true if 'widget' was defined in the whole scope of the widget. That's not the case. Just try this: <pre> <code> <script type="text/javascript"> widget.onLoad = function() { widget.addBody('Test'); } </script> </code> </pre> ...and... <pre> <code> <script type="text/javascript"> this.onLoad = function() { widget.addBody('Test'); } </script> </code> </pre> Nope. That would be true if ‘widget’ was defined in the whole scope of the widget. That’s not the case. Just try this:


<script type="text/javascript">
widget.onLoad = function() {
  widget.addBody('Test');
  }
</script>

…and…


<script type="text/javascript">
this.onLoad = function() {
  widget.addBody('Test');
  }
</script>
]]> By: yoan http://dev.netvibes.com/blog/2007/11/08/widgetize-your-nabaztag/#comment-1937 yoan Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:05:06 +0000 http://dev.netvibes.com/blog/2007/11/08/widgetize-your-nabaztag/#comment-1937 because widget.onLoad belongs to widget, you don't have to use widget but "this" should be enough. nope? because widget.onLoad belongs to widget, you don’t have to use widget but “this” should be enough. nope?

]]>